We are a little over a month past the tragedy of Sandy Hook
Elementary School. It has been 6 weeks since a madman tore apart dozens of
families, leaving a trail of pain and questioning in his wake. Yet it doesn’t
appear as though humanity is any closer to an answer to solving our egregious
problem.
In the weeks following this tragedy, the American public
started calling for better gun control laws. It appeared as though two very
different ideas stemmed from the same issue.
The first idea was to create significantly tougher gun
control laws. The defendants argued that it would make attaining a gun much
harder for a would-be shooter, and thus lower the risk of such a tragedy occurring.
Unfortunately, I am not under the impression that it is that simple. Most
shootings occur in situations that would be incredibly hard to control. The
popular saying “Guns don’t kill people, people kill people” is uncomfortably
true. The problem isn’t the ability to use guns. The problem is with the people
who are doing the killing.
Another proposed solution is actually to legalize the
ability for college students to bring guns to school with them. The idea is
that, if it isn’t possible to control the killers, you might as well arm the
potential victims. To say the least, this is a ridiculous idea. As a college
student myself, I would say that my judgment is suspect at best at times, and I
would live in constant fear if I knew that my peers, who I trust far less than
I trust myself, have the ability to carry concealed weapons on their person. There
is no good reason that we, as students, should have to live in fear of having
guns in our college classrooms. This goes for the legal ones as well as the
illegal.
I am, in essence, on two seemingly oppositional sides of the
same debate. I am not in favor of restricting second amendment rights, because
I do not believe it is the government’s job to tell me how I am to protect my
household. At the same time, I also believe that making guns more accessible is
not the solution either, because more guns would not scare people straight. It
would lead to conflicts where individuals would be far more likely to come out
guns blazing. Literally.
The issue truly comes down to a need for further education.
I am going to stop short of calling for schools to teach gun safety, but I do
say that there is a need for students in public schools to learn what it means
to wield a weapon, the ramifications of violence, and what it means to kill
someone. While death is an uncomfortable topic of conversation, I believe it is
one that must be spoken of more frequently in schools. The assumption at this
point is that an initial conversation about death, what it means, and how it
impacts people will occur at home. This conversation must stretch into the
classrooms, so that a more thorough appreciation of life can stem from it.
The true root of the issue is the valuing of human life. A
gunman intent on killing a classroom full of children demonstrates not only a mental
illness, but also a lack of appreciation for the act of living. This is also
one of the reasons, I believe, that murder-suicide is so common amongst high
school shootings. A killer doesn’t have an appreciation for life, including
their own. They don’t understand the power of their actions, and the finality
of death. Which is why, with a better education on death, I believe the desire
for killing would decrease.
In the wake of Sandy Hook, we have seen several smaller
scale shooting incidents, which lead me to believe that this tragedy served
less of an awakening as it should have. We as an American society owe it to the
victims and their families to find a way to live together, and a way to cease
from killing one another.
A few comments to spark further debate: You say "...Yet it doesn’t appear as though humanity is any closer to an answer to solving our egregious problem." I would like to challenge this. Many politicians have come out for further gun control laws, and ones that would extend much farther than the reach of the current legislation. The great State of New York was the first to pass such a bill, signed by Governor Cuomo that greatly restricted access to certain types of assault weapons, especially those that utilize large magazines. Additionally, President Obama tabbed the Vice President to lead to charge for stricter gun control, and last week they announced a comprehensive package that would place stricted frederal regulations on buying and selling firearms.
ReplyDeleteYour third graph, about the uncomfortable trueness of "guns don't kill people, people kill people," is another area for good debate. I vehemently disagree with your confirmation of that saying, and for me the best example of why is an event that took place on December 14, 2012. No, not the shootings in Newtown, but in Shanghai, China, where 22 schoolchildren were stabbed by a madman. A madman, just like the one at Sandy Hook. You are correct, the situation starts with the perpetrators themselves (and as an aside, this is why i believe there has to be some sort of mental health care discussion in addition to the gun control discussion). However, the difference between the madman in China is that he didnt have a gun, he had a knife. And instead of 22 coffins and grieving parents, we had 22 knife wounds and some stitches and bandages. ZERO deaths. People kill people, crazy people kill people, but they do it with guns, and the guns are far far too easy to obtain.